Dane van Niekerk struck 63 off 43 balls as South Africa Women set up a series decider with a 17-run win over England Women on the Duckworth-Lewis method in the rain-hit second T20 at Newlands. Van Niekerk and skipper Mignon de Preez (47no) propelled the hosts to 145-3 off 17.2 overs before bad weather interrupted the match for the second and final time.Sarah Taylors 66 off 52 balls - her 14th T20i half-century and second in as many games - had earlier steered England Women to 156-6 off their allocation.Taylor anchored Englands innings after the visitors were put in, sharing stands of 59 and 63 with Charlotte Edwards (34 off 22) and Heather Knight (29 off 20) respectively after the early loss of Tammy Beaumont.She pushed on after Edwards was bowled off-stump by Sune Luus (2-26) attempting to reverse sweep, reaching her fifty off 43 balls having been dropped by Chloe Tryon on 35.Knight offered bold support, striking the first six of the game over wide long on to take England to 107-3 off 15 overs before she picked out Marizanne Kapp in the deep off Shabnim Ismail when trying to clear the rope again. Sarah Taylor acknowledges the applause for her half-century Taylor failed to bat through the innings when she was run out in a final over costing just four runs while attempting to come back for a second off Ismail, Jenny Gunn suffering the same fate two balls later.South Africa, like England, accumulated 52-1 off their first six overs - Trisha Chetty the sole casualty, run out after a horror mid-pitch mix-up with Van Niekerk.England had chances to remove Van Niekerk early but the opener was put down by Gunn on six and Edwards on 22.The 22-year-old struck the ball crisply all around the wicket to bring up her fifty off 34 balls, posting her fifty-run stand with Du Preez off 40 balls.But with the pressure building on England, Van Niekerk advanced looking to hit Rebecca Grundy down the ground and was stumped by Taylor to break a 68-run stand. The hosts were ahead of the Duckworth-Lewis target - needing 49 runs off 42 balls to win - when rain brought a 10-minute break, South Africa on 108-2 off 13 overs at the time.On the restart Du Preez picked up where she left off, getting the chase down to less than a run-a-ball with four overs left as the 16th over - bowled by Shrubsole - cost 14.Kapp whipped Georgia Elwiss for six to keep the momentum up before falling lbw to the spinner and when rain returned, the hosts still had the edge, needing just 12 off 16 balls.Watch the third T20 between South Africa Women and England Women live on Sky Sports 2 from 7.55am on Sunday. Air Jordan 3 For Sale Cheap .C. at the helm of the top team in the Eastern Conference. His tenure as the GM in Vancouver was all too brief. Though he led the Canucks to what was then a franchise record-shattering campaign in just his second season, Nonis was gone and replaced one year later. Air Jordan Retro 3 For Cheap . McPhee said that Ovechkins father Mikhail is in stable condition after having the surgery this week and is no longer in intensive care. "Weve told him to stay as long as necessary with your dad," he said. Ovechkin and his Russian national team were eliminated from the mens hockey tournament in Sochi on Wednesday with a 3-1 quarter-final loss to Finland. http://www.airjordan3cheap.com/ . Denis Coderre, the former federal MP who was elected mayor on Nov. 3, has drawn the ire of some Montreal Canadiens. During last nights game he tweeted: "Hello? Can we get a one-way ticket to (minor-league) Hamilton for David Desharnais please. Cheap Air Jordan 3 Wholesale .Y. - Jerome Samson scored once in regulation and again in the shootout as the St. Discount Air Jordan 3 . Then the Pacers gave Oladipo and his Orlando teammates the cold shoulder. Paul Georges buzzer-beating 3-pointer at the end of the third quarter spurred a 21-4 run, finally sending Indiana past the Magic 97-87 in a tougher-than-expected opening night matchup. On December 5, the Supreme Court of India will reconvene to address the long-standing impasse between the BCCI and the Lodha Committee. Since July 18, when it approved a majority of the recommendations proposed by the Lodha Committee for best practices in the BCCI and its state associations, the court has directed the Indian board to implement them. The BCCI, though, has steadily resisted implementing most of the recommendations.Despite finding substance in the Lodha Committees claim of the BCCIs intransigence, the court opted to exercise patience. It reserved its order on superseding the BCCIs office bearers with a panel of administrators, as was recommended by the committee in September.Instead, the court gave the BCCI time to prove it would convince the states to adopt the approved recommendations in total. But at three meetings conducted by the BCCI since October, including two special general meetings (SGMs), the state associations remained steadfast in their defiance of certain recommendations.Consequently, the Lodha Committee, in its latest status report, asked the court for the second time to remove all ineligible office bearers at the BCCI and state levels, and to appoint an observer to oversee the boards business deals.Click here for the key points of the case till October. The following is a synopsis of the hearings since then, and the key questions before the court when it reconvenes on Monday.What did the court state in its previous order?On October 21, the court passed an interim order asking the BCCI to cease and desist from disbursing funds to state associations until the association gave a written resolution that it would adopt all the recommendations approved by the court.The court also asked BCCI president Anurag Thakur and secretary Ajay Shirke to meet the Lodha committee within two weeks from the date of that order and submit an affidavit of compliance, elaborating on the recommendations already implemented by the BCCI and what it had done to persuade the state associations to adopt the remaining recommendations.Have the states submitted written undertakings? Only the Hyderabad Cricket Association submitted an undertaking to the Lodha Committee, saying it would comply with the July 18 court order without any reservations.What about Thakur and Shirkes affidavit of compliance?On November 5, Thakur submitted a report to the committee stating that 30 state associations had rejected adopting the recommendations in total, and instead had wanted to vote for and against each one at the boards SGM on October 1. Thakur said he was rendered incapable despite being armed with the court order and could not force the recommendations on the members who said any amendment to the BCCI constitution required a three-fourth majority by vote.On October 15, at an informal meeting of the board, Shirke reminded the members that not complying with the court order would have consequences. According to Thakur, the members still stuck to the decision taken at the October 1 SGM. At its latest meeting, on December 2, the BCCI said the members had reiterated their stance of not adopting the recommendations in total, and woould wait for the courts observations on December 5.ddddddddddddWhat were the immediate consequences for the BCCI and the state associations? Having understood the BCCI would not adhere to the court order, the Lodha Committee played hardball as well. It did not appoint an auditor to oversee BCCI contracts, as directed by the court on October 21, or specify the threshold limit for various contractual agreements entered into by the board, thereby limiting its operational freedom. The court had said that any contracts exceeding the threshold limit would need to be approved by the committee.The board, therefore, was unable to release funds to the states ahead of the ongoing home Test series against England. It had to approach the court, which said INR 58.66 lakh (USD 86,000 approx) could be disbursed to each of the five state associations hosting the England series.While the BCCI has been defiant in public, some of its senior office bearers and officials are worried the image of the board has taken a hit, especially after the tender for IPL broadcasting and media rights for the next cycle starting in 2018 was postponed indefinitely because the committee had not appointed an auditor or specified a threshold limit. The IPL rights bids were to be opened on October 25.What has the Lodha Committee said in its latest status report?On November 18, the committee submitted its third status report on the BCCIs response to the July 18 court order. It said that the office bearers of both the BCCI and the states who fall foul of the eligibility norms - as per the recommendations - should be removed with immediate effect. The committee also suggested that GK Pillai, the former home secretary in the federal government, be appointed an observer of the BCCI and that he oversee the financial transactions of the board.Is there anything else that the court needs to decide on? There is one other issue, concerning Thakurs alleged request to the ICC for a letter questioning whether the appointment of a comptroller and auditor general official on the proposed Apex Council amounted to government interference in the BCCI. The ICC does not permit government interference in member boards, and members can be suspended if such interference is allowed. In such a scenario, the BCCI might have used the threat of Indias suspension by the ICC as valid grounds to strike down that particular recommendation.ICC chief executive David Richardson had said Thakur had wanted such a letter. Richardson said Thakur had verbally asked for a letter and ICC chairman Shashank Manohar turned down the request, saying the BCCI needed to put it down in writing first. Thakur submitted an affidavit on October 17 denying the charge.In its October 21 order, the court said prima facie that it was clear Thakur had asked Manohar for a letter, a matter of serious concern. It asked the Lodha Committee to write to Manohar asking for an affidavit to set the record straight. On December 5, the committee will reveal the contents of the affidavit in court. ' ' '